Talk:French team of experts: Arafat not poisoned

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search


I'm suspending review of this for a bit, to attend to a breaking article. Just a couple of notes, to myself or whoever else might tackle this.

  • The sourcing on this confused me. This was not an official announcement, so the headline should be adjusted. The focus is the leak, as BBC notes.
  • There have been further developments in the story; I see an Al Jazeera article about what the Swiss said about the French report, which notes that the Swiss have seen the French report although the French report hasn't been released. I haven't actually made any call about whether this would actually be rendered stale by further developments, but it certainly does reassure as far as single-source dangers go.

--Pi zero (talk) 22:21, 5 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Well, on consideration I'm thinking the headline is okay for the current focus — if the focus is current, which unfortunately has gotten more doubtful due to the delay from covering Mandela's death. --Pi zero (talk) 15:00, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]
There's another problem with the headline, in that it doesn't appear to be an actual direct quote; I expect to fix that. --Pi zero (talk) 16:03, 6 December 2013 (UTC)Reply[reply]

Review of revision 2215787 [Passed][edit]