Talk:Gilad Shalit to be exchanged for Palestinian prisoners

Review of revision 1299883 [Not ready]

Revision 1299883 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: WSJ wants me to subscribe in order to view the article. I don't know why some reviewers don't even notice WSJ paywalls (accessing from univerties that subscribe??), but I do, and we do have a policy that pay-to-view sources are inadmissible. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1299883 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:52, 11 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: WSJ wants me to subscribe in order to view the article. I don't know why some reviewers don't even notice WSJ paywalls (accessing from univerties that subscribe??), but I do, and we do have a policy that pay-to-view sources are inadmissible. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1299920 [Passed]

Revision 1299920 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1299920 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:58, 11 October 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

militant

I think calling Hamas members as Palestinian militants is somewhat against NPOV. I suggest to use "Hamas members" instead of "Palestinian militants". Americophile (talk) 15:46, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

The phrasing is taken from the earlier article listed under Related News (taking from another en.wn article, we don't have to worry about copyright as long we've cited it). In the earlier article, "militant" is linked to en.wp militant.

To me, it seems a technically accurate description — Palestinian, and militant. It's hard to see how anyone who isn't militant would capture a member of IDF. --Pi zero (talk) 16:07, 12 October 2011 (UTC)

OK, no problem! Americophile (talk) 16:22, 12 October 2011 (UTC)