Jump to content

Talk:Guardiola to replace Pellegrini as Manchester City manager

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Add topic
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Pi zero in topic Review of revision 4172753 [Passed]

Review of revision 4172753 [Passed]

[edit]
@Pi zero:Instagram source: noted, but can you just check the one used of Nemanja Vidić's articles (flagged) if that contained enough news. And is the second point about DFB Pokal, Borussia Dortmund and Bayern Dortmund rivalry? Well, we should start adding CAT:Bundesliga to archived articles.
AGastya (talk) 06:45, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
A whole lot of articles are marked for adding Bundesliga, and some other leagues iirc; but the threshold for those requests is too low, so that we've got a huge backlog of requests each one of which has to be carefully considered, causing action on that sort of requests to just about grind to a halt. --Pi zero (talk) 12:48, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
@Pi zero: Should we list all those articles about Bundesliga games, (and articles really related to Bundesliga, Precautious as compared to last time) and then tackle it?
AGastya (talk) 13:00, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
Not sure what to do about the Bundesliga thing; honestly I've been more focused on trying to move forward on the dialog tools problem, which looks pretty urgent to me when I've spent years developing tools that don't work on some major browsers and I'm only hoping it's a problem that can be fixed readily. I do think in future it might make more sense, when proposing to populate a category with lots of articles, to make a list of the articles somewhere with a single editprotected tag on the list instead of marking each article's talk page individually.

The instagram source on the other article, meh, it's quite short, on the other hand it's not as short. I don't remember whether there was any info in the instagram source that wasn't in the other; just to complicate things, when I looked at the sources closely that was during the first review, when the article was a bit shorter than it later became. A stronger source would still be desirable, but whether I'd have commented on it... hard to say, perhaps not. --Pi zero (talk) 13:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)Reply