Talk:Large Hadron Collider restarted
Obviously the current "Large Hardron Collider restarted" title is just a working one - it could die again - and, something more newsy would be nice - as long as less-cheesy than the BBC's one. Surely we can mug a physics geek from Wikipedia for a science joke title? --Brian McNeil / talk 22:47, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Really somewhat inappropriate, but, ... "European physicists to start playing with Large Hadrons again". :-P --Brian McNeil / talk 22:48, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Yes, a better title is much desired. I was planning to prepare this story tonight for the weekend, had no idea they were going to get this far tonight! the wub "?!" 22:56, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you could bug someone there for a quote or two... ;-) --Brian McNeil / talk 22:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- I expect they're rather busy :) the wub "?!" 23:01, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
- Well, you could bug someone there for a quote or two... ;-) --Brian McNeil / talk 22:59, 20 November 2009 (UTC)
Title: LCH: Chilled Out and Fired Up 76.172.219.186 (talk) 13:12, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
- Cute. Alas, a bit far past publication to change. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:45, 25 November 2009 (UTC)
Review of revision 914491 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 914491 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 914491 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:24, 21 November 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |