Talk:London Olympics organizers apologize after North Korea flag gaffe

Review of revision 1566051 [Not ready]

Revision 1566051 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: We require at least two mutually independent trust-worthy sources verifying the focal event of the article. We also recommend that all sources be read before beginning to write. The headline should be a sentence, not a noun phrase; it should preferably use active voice, and capitalization should be downstyle (as if it were a sentence). The article should be a minimum of three medium-sized paragraphs, using inverted pyramid style starting with a lede succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the focal news event of the article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1566051 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 03:41, 26 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not ready: See below. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: We require at least two mutually independent trust-worthy sources verifying the focal event of the article. We also recommend that all sources be read before beginning to write. The headline should be a sentence, not a noun phrase; it should preferably use active voice, and capitalization should be downstyle (as if it were a sentence). The article should be a minimum of three medium-sized paragraphs, using inverted pyramid style starting with a lede succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the basic questions about the focal news event of the article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1567860 [Passed]

Revision 1567860 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The big mistake here was the quote misattributed to Mitchell, there being no evidence in the sources that he was the one who said that. As reviewer, I have to maintain sufficient independence from the article to review, so I couldn't replace the quote with something that Mitchell did say, although that too would have eliminated the misattribution problem; correcting the attribution, however, was within my purview. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1567860 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:25, 27 July 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The big mistake here was the quote misattributed to Mitchell, there being no evidence in the sources that he was the one who said that. As reviewer, I have to maintain sufficient independence from the article to review, so I couldn't replace the quote with something that Mitchell did say, although that too would have eliminated the misattribution problem; correcting the attribution, however, was within my purview. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Request to add category

Can you please add Category: Women's association football to this article? Thank you. Hmlarson (talk) 06:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)

addressed. --LauraHale (talk) 08:32, 26 November 2013 (UTC)