Talk:Loreen wins Eurovision for Sweden for second time

Sources

@Wasabi OS: Are all these sources really needed? We have a rule against listing unnecessary sources — it slows down review, for one thing. Heavy Water (talk) 16:02, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

I have slimmed down the sources to five. Several of the sources repeated information so I removed those. Wasabi OS (talk) 16:13, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Sorry, another thing: Postsen looks like a blog or a content farm. Any chance it could be replaced? Heavy Water (talk) 16:23, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

I've replaced that too with a report from Corriere della Sera. It is a more reliable source. Wasabi OS (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

Review of revision 4727776 [Passed]

Revision 4727776 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A good first article, Wasabi OS. You'll notice this is much shorter: Significant parts of the article, especially background, weren't in the sources. Did you use WP articles for sourcing? Because that really can't be done because it ain't reliable, as it acknowledges (it would have to be cited, anyway), though its sources can be used. Another thing: to access the semifinal results for Sweden one has to use a drop-down menu which alters the URL. I wavered on this, but I eventually cut what wasn't in the other sources about the semifinals because changing the URL means changing the source — and changing or adding sources is very much outside what a reviewer can do absent extraordinary circumstances. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4727776 of this article has been reviewed by Heavy Water (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:36, 17 May 2023 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: A good first article, Wasabi OS. You'll notice this is much shorter: Significant parts of the article, especially background, weren't in the sources. Did you use WP articles for sourcing? Because that really can't be done because it ain't reliable, as it acknowledges (it would have to be cited, anyway), though its sources can be used. Another thing: to access the semifinal results for Sweden one has to use a drop-down menu which alters the URL. I wavered on this, but I eventually cut what wasn't in the other sources about the semifinals because changing the URL means changing the source — and changing or adding sources is very much outside what a reviewer can do absent extraordinary circumstances. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

And please see the edit history for more. Heavy Water (talk) 00:44, 17 May 2023 (UTC)