The article as submitted had a critical need to better explain in the lede the significance of the focal event. If I'd gotten to this sooner I might have preferred to not-ready it, leaving revision to the reporter; I was just able to accomplish the purpose by shifting material up from much later in the article, and tweaking the headline.
It might have been interesting, if workable, to introduce some additional source to support a bit more background (somewhere well down in the WN:inverted pyramid) of the whole posthumous marriage thing — how does that work, how rare is it (one of the sources says there are very few places in the world where it's legal).
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
The article as submitted had a critical need to better explain in the lede the significance of the focal event. If I'd gotten to this sooner I might have preferred to not-ready it, leaving revision to the reporter; I was just able to accomplish the purpose by shifting material up from much later in the article, and tweaking the headline.
It might have been interesting, if workable, to introduce some additional source to support a bit more background (somewhere well down in the WN:inverted pyramid) of the whole posthumous marriage thing — how does that work, how rare is it (one of the sources says there are very few places in the world where it's legal).
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
