Talk:Marco Silva joins Watford on two-year deal after Hull City relegated from Premier League

Two articles

This is two articles on one page. --Pi zero (talk) 01:21, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

@Acagastya, wanna split this page? --George Ho (talk) 01:35, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4317696 [Not ready]

Revision 4317696 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This appears to be two articles, put one after the other on a single page. I don't see why it couldn't be two on two separate pages, but splitting it that way would feel much too invasive for a reviewer to remain independent. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4317696 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 01:27, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: This appears to be two articles, put one after the other on a single page. I don't see why it couldn't be two on two separate pages, but splitting it that way would feel much too invasive for a reviewer to remain independent. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• It's my tentative opinion at this time that the above review was a mental glitch on my part. But, whatever. We move forward from where we are. --Pi zero (talk) 15:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4317922 [Passed]

Revision 4317922 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4317922 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.