Talk:Murdoch drops BSkyB bid amid public, political pressure

Review of revision 1258574 [Failed]

Revision 1258574 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: purple prose — "dramatic blow", "immense pressure"; "media empire" (that one's mostly used by politicians, which should be a clue); "tycoon" Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1258574 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 16:53, 13 July 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: purple prose — "dramatic blow", "immense pressure"; "media empire" (that one's mostly used by politicians, which should be a clue); "tycoon" Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1258625 [Passed]

Revision 1258625 of this article has been reviewed by BarkingFish (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Reviewing the previous fail, I can see that the bias has been stripped, as has the prose, the work is looking good, the information is verifiable from provided sources, and it's a good clean article. Published (unlike the News of the World :) ) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1258625 of this article has been reviewed by BarkingFish (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:08, 13 July 2011 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Reviewing the previous fail, I can see that the bias has been stripped, as has the prose, the work is looking good, the information is verifiable from provided sources, and it's a good clean article. Published (unlike the News of the World :) ) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.