Talk:NCAA 2010 ice hockey east and west regional tournament results

Review of revision 985663 [Passed]

Revision 985663 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 985663 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 07:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

editprotected

{{editprotected}}

The third paragraph doesn't make clear that the 66 shots faced were for both games played by RIT, not just for the game being reported on. It should read as follows:

RIT goalie Jared DeMichiel, who stopped 63 shots out of 66 on the weekend (including 24 of 26 against UNH), was named the East Regional most outstanding player.

-- LtPowers (talk) 17:21, 30 July 2010 (UTC)

Done

I don't follow hockey, so your suggestion was pretty tricky for me to research. Anyway, to put the thing in context for me, I read the bracket at http://www.insidecollegehockey.com/9NCAA/ncaa.htm and was quite baffled to find that Denver (Colorado?) was in the east region semi-final. I made the change you requested and fixed the date as well.

Please look for other errors, as I just don't have the hockey knowledge to spot them.

--InfantGorilla (talk) 06:00, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

As in basketball, the regionals are named by locations of the tournaments, which are selected years in advance; geography has a slight effect on which participants go where, but this year Denver was kind of the odd school out as far as top seeds go. LtPowers (talk) 12:18, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Thanks. One might suspect that the NCAA does this to deliberately confuse the uninitiated. The air fares must be huge! --InfantGorilla (talk) 13:10, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

I'm concerned that this goes beyond WN:ARCHIVE. Perhaps a correction notice is necessary? Benny the mascot (talk) 02:48, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

This is why I left it unflagged for a third opinion (yours) to review. though it seems to me to be within the archiving policy. Which of the 4 changes I made might need a correction notice? --InfantGorilla (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the change I proposed, that Benny (who since retired) reverted. We need to decide whether to make a change like that, or instead to post a correction banner. --InfantGorilla (talk) 10:32, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

You can argue the toss over the rest, but adding the text "across the weekend (including 24 of 26 against UNH)" is clearly a content edit. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 20:27, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

OK, I concede. Lets post a correction banner. Wording? --InfantGorilla (talk) 12:07, 25 August 2010 (UTC)

Caveats: I know nothing about hockey, and one of the four sources appears to be no longer extant.

To me, the correction of "Region" to "Regional" seems within archival policy, likewise the parenthetical "(RIT)".

The remaining sources seem to me to say that the game between RIT and UNH took place on Saturday, not on Sunday as stated in the change that Benny reverted.

How do we know what time period the 63 out of 66 shots were over? --Pi zero (talk) 20:23, 13 September 2010 (UTC)