Wikinews talk:Briefs/June 11, 2012
Damascus story[edit]
This story should be recoverable; that's why I merely commented it out, as a way of indicating it hadn't actually passed, rather than removing it. The facts are verified by the supplemental source, and this isn't the first time we've had a briefs item that expands rather freely on our previous published article — but since it doesn't even share the same focus as our earlier article, it needs to have two independent sources. Afaics, there isn't any information in this briefs item that comes from our previously published article.
(Meanwhile, I haven't finished going through the other items yet.) --Pi zero (talk) 22:57, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- I'm allowing the bit about Union Rags winning the Belmont even though it only has one source, though this is marginal. My excuse for allowing it is that a big part of the piece is still about I'll Have Another. But it'd be the better part of valor to have a second source for Union Rags. :-) --Pi zero (talk) 23:05, 10 June 2012 (UTC)
- These matters appear to have been cleared up. --Pi zero (talk) 00:23, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
- Thanks Pi for the thorough review and like always making the work better!Crtew (talk) 00:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1526847 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 1526847 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1526847 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 00:08, 12 June 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |