Although I was immediately concerned, when I saw this up for review, about our minimal-length threshold, a quick look at the sources left me suspecting there's rather a dearth of information available at all; so I'm reserving judgement till I have a chance to investigate closely. --Pi zero (talk) 22:25, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This is slightly below what we usually require for minimal length. There's remarkably little about the death on the internet, though, which is reflected in the sourcing here, for which the reporter seems to have done quite well at the time. I wondered about additional sources becoming available later, since it had taken longer than I'd hoped for me to get to this review; and indeed there are one or two additional sources about it, but even they are for the most part remarkably short. There's an article about the funeral somewhere I think (maybe All Africa?); it only occurred to me belatedly that one might hope to augment the article just a bit with some facts about him verified by sources cited in the en.wp article about him. At any rate, I've chosen to allow the article at its current length, this time, but would encourage us all to try to do a bit better on length in similar circumstances hereafter.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
This is slightly below what we usually require for minimal length. There's remarkably little about the death on the internet, though, which is reflected in the sourcing here, for which the reporter seems to have done quite well at the time. I wondered about additional sources becoming available later, since it had taken longer than I'd hoped for me to get to this review; and indeed there are one or two additional sources about it, but even they are for the most part remarkably short. There's an article about the funeral somewhere I think (maybe All Africa?); it only occurred to me belatedly that one might hope to augment the article just a bit with some facts about him verified by sources cited in the en.wp article about him. At any rate, I've chosen to allow the article at its current length, this time, but would encourage us all to try to do a bit better on length in similar circumstances hereafter.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
