Talk:Non-sponsors' logos plastered by peeved Paralympians

Journalist notes

I have an audio file which will be uploaded later today but can't upload as I can't access it and I can't convert it. Bidgee (talk) 04:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Bidgee (talk) 10:38, 18 May 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1502683 [Not ready]

Revision 1502683 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Is this an exclusive interview? There's a template for that (distinct from more general 'original reporting'). It needs to be clear in the lede that this is an interview (if I'm correct that it is). The interview is actually the news event, the very thing that makes the article newsworthy at all, and that makes the interview-ness of the thing focal; so, as I said, it needs to be mentioned in the lede. The change needed may be quite small, in word count; but I don't have the information to do it right, so it'll need to be the reporter. (Btw, the talk page really ought to say a few basic words of introduction and then present the hand-written notes — since they need some context to understand (as this focus difficulty with the article demonstrates). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1502683 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 09:54, 18 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Is this an exclusive interview? There's a template for that (distinct from more general 'original reporting'). It needs to be clear in the lede that this is an interview (if I'm correct that it is). The interview is actually the news event, the very thing that makes the article newsworthy at all, and that makes the interview-ness of the thing focal; so, as I said, it needs to be mentioned in the lede. The change needed may be quite small, in word count; but I don't have the information to do it right, so it'll need to be the reporter. (Btw, the talk page really ought to say a few basic words of introduction and then present the hand-written notes — since they need some context to understand (as this focus difficulty with the article demonstrates). Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 1503267 [Passed]

Revision 1503267 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I modified some copyedits by other reviewers (see edit history), in some (but not all) cases splitting the difference between the original and the other's copyedit. Had some difficulty with the audio file due to low volume, but managed to hear it well enough. It helped with verification; thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1503267 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:44, 18 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I modified some copyedits by other reviewers (see edit history), in some (but not all) cases splitting the difference between the original and the other's copyedit. Had some difficulty with the audio file due to low volume, but managed to hear it well enough. It helped with verification; thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.