Talk:Norway gunman defends actions as 'gruesome but necessary'
Add topicReview of revision 1263497 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 1263497 of this article has been reviewed by William S. Saturn (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1263497 of this article has been reviewed by William S. Saturn (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:57, 24 July 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
This article should explain the bombings since the wikinews article concentrated completely on the shootings
[edit]No wikinews article has pulled the two together. This subject deserves a more comprehensive treatment. There are sources that say that Norway concentrated on representing Christen views, that it published anti Islamic cartoons etc. Is there no effort to pull the sources together. There is no wikinews article that actually explains the situation represented in multiple news articles available on the web. The article on the shooting doesn't even mention that the suspect is Norwegian! Mattisse (talk) 20:04, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- At some point these articles should get beyond the trivial headlines that are everywhere, e.g. Analysis: Norway massacre exposes incendiary immigration issue} and [http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/world/la-fg-norway-psyche-20110725,0,3508047.story Norway attacks shatter a nation's innocence. wikinews will never make it on just headlines. That is the way to make wikipedia excel. Mattisse (talk) 22:02, 24 July 2011 (UTC)
- You are free to add whatever you wish to the article for the next 24 hours, or perhaps write another article that goes into greater detail.--William S. Saturn (talk) 22:12, 24 July 2011 (UTC)