Talk:OpenOffice.org 3.0 released by Sun Microsystems

This reads like a {{press release}} for the software. --Brian McNeil / ^talk 17:28, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Did some workaround to avoid that.-- Tharikrish^Talk 17:52, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Still sounds pretty jubilant. --SVTCobra 22:43, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Agreed. Criticism and other reactions/effects, analysis of features, comparisons to other office suites and FOSS software could make such news reports better. It's by no means bad, but some ideas/constructive criticism for the future. TransUtopian (talk) 23:49, 14 October 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 709860 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: reads a bit rough, but 'good nuff' --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 22:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 709860 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: reads a bit rough, but 'good nuff' --ShakataGaNai ^_^ 22:17, 14 October 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.