Talk:Paris rail terminus temporarily shut down by unplanned strike

Collaboration

I am going off line for many hours. Perhaps someone else can finish this story while it is still fresh. --InfantGorilla (talk) 21:06, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

I can't read French and don't know what is meant by an "industrial action". --SVTCobra 21:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

OK, it is a strike or other labor action. But I still don't speak French. Google is very tight in yielding English sources, but I think I am finally finding some. --SVTCobra 23:47, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

The IHT source was very limited. I appear stuck in developing this further. I cannot verify the details. --SVTCobra 00:17, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

I won't get back to it in reasonable time - thanks for trying to help. Maybe we can use it to start the Shorts for the 14th. (Assuming a French-speaking fact checker comes along in time.) OK to switch to strike - I guess the phrase 'industrial action' is only used in some English-speaking countries, but you understood it correctly. --InfantGorilla (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2009 (UTC)

Review

Revision 751908 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Brief, it should be moved into the daily new brief if anyone creates one in the next few hours. But otherwise a nice little article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 751908 of this article has been reviewed by PatrickFlaherty (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:58, 14 January 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Brief, it should be moved into the daily new brief if anyone creates one in the next few hours. But otherwise a nice little article. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.