There were some problems on fact-check, at least one of which raised a possible neutrality issue (no evidence Metcalfe was responding to a criticism of deliberate voter suppression, as well as no evidence of accusation any suppression was directed at Democrats per se). Didn't find the claimed 4–2 margin, although there was a mention of two justices having a certain position.
This is very marginal for freshness. Any time from two days one it would be unremarkable to judge it stale, and when this was written (a day ago, by the calendar) it had already been two days since the last new development, three days since the focal event.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
There were some problems on fact-check, at least one of which raised a possible neutrality issue (no evidence Metcalfe was responding to a criticism of deliberate voter suppression, as well as no evidence of accusation any suppression was directed at Democrats per se). Didn't find the claimed 4–2 margin, although there was a mention of two justices having a certain position.
This is very marginal for freshness. Any time from two days one it would be unremarkable to judge it stale, and when this was written (a day ago, by the calendar) it had already been two days since the last new development, three days since the focal event.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
