Talk:Red Cross appeals for US$33 million in food relief for Zimbabwe

Review of revision 921522 [Passed]

Revision 921522 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 921522 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:15, 12 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 921525 [Passed]

Revision 921525 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please do not submit an article for review until it is ready. Your category additions mess EZ PR around and I have to go back and check what changes were made. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 921525 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 14:16, 12 December 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Please do not submit an article for review until it is ready. Your category additions mess EZ PR around and I have to go back and check what changes were made. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Sorry. But it's easier to create an article with {{review}} first, then add categories, instead of adding {{review}} in a separate edit. And I wasn't expecting this to be published so quickly after creation. Thanks for the quick review though. Tempodivalse [talk] 14:19, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

It's not exactly a big issue - and we all stick the template on and then think of something else - but I commented because you allways do it. Maybe we should go over to the water cooler and see if we can get and ultra-lazy "submit for review" button as a gadget? Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:26, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

We already do, at {{develop}}. I probably should be using it, but never got into the habit. Plus, articles are almost never reviewed immediately after being created, so the chance of something like this happening is quite low. Tempodivalse [talk] 14:30, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, see, I don't tend to use that template unless I'm actually going away and leaving an article in an unfinished state. Maybe we should stick the same on {{editing}}, since I should use that more, and be able to go direct from working to done. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:36, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, we probably could add it there too. I usually write up my articles in an external text editor (like Notepad or WordPad), copy-and-paste it into the wiki, and go directly to {{review}} - skipping other stages like {{develop}} and {{editing}}, so i don't make use of the quick-review button either. Tempodivalse [talk] 14:43, 12 December 2009 (UTC)