Talk:Relics found behind The Ruins of St. Paul, Macau

Review of revision 1033306 [Failed]

Revision 1033306 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I can't prove anything on the article, because I don't speak Chinese, and automatic translator suck at it. Find at least one English (or Spanish one) NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1033306 of this article has been reviewed by Diego Grez (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 20:39, 31 May 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I can't prove anything on the article, because I don't speak Chinese, and automatic translator suck at it. Find at least one English (or Spanish one) NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• Comment, I'd like to note that having English sources is not a prerequisite for publishing an article. Surely we can find someone through Babel or even IRC that knows Chinese? Tempodivalse [talk] 20:42, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

  I think so, but Chinese sources make it very difficult, unlike Spanish, French, or even Russian sources, which work well on automatic translate tools. --Diego Grez ^{return fire} 20:43, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

• Comment, if you've looked closely, there is ONE source in English (Macau Daily Times).--Notnd (talk) 10:09, 1 June 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1034286 [Passed]

Revision 1034286 of this article has been reviewed by Fire in the Hole (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: could verify this with the english source, thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1034286 of this article has been reviewed by Fire in the Hole (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:12, 1 June 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: could verify this with the english source, thanks. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.