Talk:Remaining Expedition 25 crew to launch to International Space Station

Review of revision 1107557 [Failed]

Revision 1107557 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I couldn't find in the given sources anything from "Wheelock and Walker both participated..." on; everything before that I found. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1107557 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 00:22, 6 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: I couldn't find in the given sources anything from "Wheelock and Walker both participated..." on; everything before that I found. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Someone else will have to review this, now

The later material, that I wasn't able to verify before, turned out to be too close to its source — which was quickly evident once the source was provided (a copy of what NASA had posted earlier but then changed). There were also some inaccuracies that had been introduced, but simply fixing them would only have left the too-close-ness intact (and made it slightly worse). I extensively rearranged and modified the later two paragraphs, and the result IMHO reads well. However I'm no longer uninvolved enough to peer-review it. --Pi zero (talk) 03:33, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Text written by NASA is in the public domain. That means that as far as copyright is concerned, press releases can be posted with very little re-writing (as long as they are attributed.) However, if you needed to modify it for neutrality, style or accuracy, that is a different matter. Did you? --InfantGorilla (talk) 13:46, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

I undid the changes that seemed to me to be over the line into self-review. --Pi zero (talk) 15:14, 6 October 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1107809 [Passed]

Revision 1107809 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1107809 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 15:11, 6 October 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.