Talk:Rocket strike near hotel in Afghan capital injures four

Review of revision 914765 [Failed]

Revision 914765 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: VOA just gives me an error message. Is the claim in the lede of 2 injured wrong, or is four? If unclear the title/lead should not assert one or the other is correct. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 914765 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 18:37, 21 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: VOA just gives me an error message. Is the claim in the lede of 2 injured wrong, or is four? If unclear the title/lead should not assert one or the other is correct. NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

The URL was incorrect somehow, I guess I didn't copy it correctly - should be fixed now. I'm using the claim of four injured because it seems to be more up-to-date, and came from the official - and most other news sites are saying that as well. (VOA doesn't update their articles frequently, i think.) Could you have another look? Tempodivalse [talk] 18:43, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Review of revision 914780 [Passed]

Revision 914780 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Going with four seems reasonable per talk The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 914780 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:51, 21 November 2009 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Going with four seems reasonable per talk The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.