Talk:Russian passenger jet crashes on Indonesian demonstration flight

Review of revision 1494842 [Not ready]

Revision 1494842 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Language Comments by reviewer: Last two paragraphs need a little bit of (international audience) tweaking Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1494842 of this article has been reviewed by Bddpaux (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 19:52, 9 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: Language Comments by reviewer: Last two paragraphs need a little bit of (international audience) tweaking Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

• Scooped. needs rewrite after wreckage found LeadSongDog (talk) 05:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
  • I'm sorry, you scooped it? All by yourself? Forgive me for not believing you, especially when you had a BBC link to back you up and no OR notes. This is not a story with a great deal of scope for scooping anyone as, realistically, we have nobody in the area. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 09:31, 10 May 2012 (UTC)
    • No of course I didn't scoop it, but it had been scooped. First local media did, then BBC and everyone else promulgated it. The point was that publishing a story saying that it's still missing when it has already been found would be just silly. LeadSongDog (talk) 15:29, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Competition

Rather than "Canada", should identify the competitive aircraft. Is the comparison the w:Bombardier CRJ-1000 or w:Bombardier CSeries? Should also consider the Embraer E-195 and w:Boeing 717 as direct competition. LeadSongDog (talk) 15:52, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

The issue is source-checking. Everything has to be rigorously verified by an independent reviewer from cited trust-worthy sources, and the <expletive> sources were changed between when the article was written and now as I was reviewing it. --Pi zero (talk) 16:11, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1495684 [Passed]

Revision 1495684 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1495684 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:05, 10 May 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.