Talk:Russian poet Alexander Byvshev convicted for 2015 poem about Ukraine

Review of revision 4399327 [Passed]

Revision 4399327 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The quote from Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group is about what the poem says. We allow quoting a source that becomes part of the story, which might include the Group if the quote were citing them for their focus on the human rights aspect of the situation. In fact, an extended passage, including the part quoted here as submitted, was quoted by another of the cited sources for its assessment of the merits of the case. However, the part of the extended quote concerning human rights was not part of what was quoted here; the quote here was only describing the content of the poem. We disallow quoting a source when it isn't part of the story. I wasn't comfortable with the situation, so I cut that sentence. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4399327 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 22:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The quote from Kharkiv Human Rights Protection Group is about what the poem says. We allow quoting a source that becomes part of the story, which might include the Group if the quote were citing them for their focus on the human rights aspect of the situation. In fact, an extended passage, including the part quoted here as submitted, was quoted by another of the cited sources for its assessment of the merits of the case. However, the part of the extended quote concerning human rights was not part of what was quoted here; the quote here was only describing the content of the poem. We disallow quoting a source when it isn't part of the story. I wasn't comfortable with the situation, so I cut that sentence. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

VKontakte nomenclature

• The license agreement, https://vk.com/licence, states up-front that the LLC is "V Kontakte", the social network is known as "VKontakte", and it is hosted at VK.com.
• They're clearly branding themselves, on their pages, as "VK".

This article, and one previous article in our archives, adhere to this nomenclature. This article refers to "social network VKontakte", and notes parenthentically "(VK)" which, while one might argue it's unnecessary, is what they're branding themselves as. If somebody wants us to remove the parenthetical, I have no objection. The previous article, "Russia asks Facebook to comply with personal data policy", refers to "website[...] VK.com".

For my part, I don't see a need for further discussion on the matter, since we're fully in line with the license and the sources. However, if there is to be any further discussion, I would ask that we keep it impersonal and directed to this particular case (there is no reason whatever for drama over this, both because we can discuss it without drama, and because it isn't worth getting dramatic about). --Pi zero (talk) 19:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)