Talk:Solicitor of presenter Stuart Hall denies indecent assault
Title
[edit]"Refutes"? I think you mean "Disputes". Refutes would mean his solicitor is putting forward compelling evidence that the allegations are without merit. --81.149.228.152 (talk) 13:35, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
- I'd wondered whether "denies" might be a reasonable choice. --Pi zero (talk) 14:07, 8 December 2012 (UTC)
Review of revision 1731020 [Passed]
[edit] ![]() |
Revision 1731020 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1731020 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:03, 8 December 2012 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Title
[edit]Can we have a title that doesn't make it sound as though it is the solicitor who is accused of indecent assault? Bencherlite (talk) 21:55, 10 December 2012 (UTC)
- I didn't think it did. Neither did the author, apparently.
- That said, and regardless of whether the headline can be significantly changed at this late date (it seems inadvisable, on top of any archive-policy issues), it's worth asking, for the future at the very least, how you would suggest the headline might be crafted differently. Preferably without producing something long and awkward. --Pi zero (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2012 (UTC)