Talk:Somali piracy: Kenyan navy kills three, Chinese ship hijacked, British couple freed

Merger

I think a merger deal between this article and British couple kidnapped in Somalia freed needs to be sorted out. --Rayboy8 (my talk) (my contributions) 14:08, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, the other article has no actual content, so there's not much to merge. I should warn that dumping lots more on one aspect of this story would be an NPOV failure, unless of course you can find no other details on the other parts. If you wish to expand, these should each be kept as close to equal as possible. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:10, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

I've now inserted some content into my article. Any comments? --Rayboy8 (my talk) (my contributions) 14:27, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

• • It's pretty much all duplicated; you could add their ages if you like (that should be in the sources already on this one) and the exact day number might be worth slipping in too. Blood Red Sandman ^{(Talk) (Contribs)} 14:30, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
• OK. I hope that helps. --Rayboy8 (my talk) (my contributions) 14:39, 14 November 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1129079 [Passed]

Revision 1129079 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Excellent roundup of import topic over short timespan, well placed in context The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1129079 of this article has been reviewed by Brian McNeil (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:33, 15 November 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Excellent roundup of import topic over short timespan, well placed in context The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Attacking errors

Re "presumed error attack" in lead, I thought this was surely "presumed [t]error attack" ? Then I looked at the revison history.diff "mistakenly attacked" as before is much clearer than "error attack"!, less chance of ambiguity. Regards, - 220.101 talk^\Contribs 16:07, 16 November 2010 (UTC)