The lede really should be broken up, with details in a second paragraph, the first paragraph being a short, to-the-point summary succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the WN:five Ws and H.
I made relatively extensive edits for distance-from-source, keeping in mind the author has been operating on Spanish-language projects and it may take some practice to learn to rephrase things in a second language. I'm supposing the need for such edits by the reviewer will decrease over time. The extent of those edits also made me more reluctant to also fiddle with the lede.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
The lede really should be broken up, with details in a second paragraph, the first paragraph being a short, to-the-point summary succinctly answering as many as reasonably possible of the WN:five Ws and H.
I made relatively extensive edits for distance-from-source, keeping in mind the author has been operating on Spanish-language projects and it may take some practice to learn to rephrase things in a second language. I'm supposing the need for such edits by the reviewer will decrease over time. The extent of those edits also made me more reluctant to also fiddle with the lede.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
