When covering a breaking situation for Wikinews, keep two pitfalls in mind.
Review can be a lengthy process, and might not start instantly when you submit, especially if there's competition on the review queue. So try to Write so that what you've written will still be true at the time of review if that's some time later.
Mainstream news sites change their articles, often removing stuff as well as adding stuff. I don't approve; it's not like they need to save paper on their website; but there it is. It's not clear what specifically you can do about it, except to be aware of the problem.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
When covering a breaking situation for Wikinews, keep two pitfalls in mind.
Review can be a lengthy process, and might not start instantly when you submit, especially if there's competition on the review queue. So try to Write so that what you've written will still be true at the time of review if that's some time later.
Mainstream news sites change their articles, often removing stuff as well as adding stuff. I don't approve; it's not like they need to save paper on their website; but there it is. It's not clear what specifically you can do about it, except to be aware of the problem.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
