Talk:Tim Curry, TV premiere screenings, cosplay feature at Fan Expo Canada

Full quote from Adrianna

Through Facebook messenger, she said:

Geeking in Toronto is always such a joy what with amazing cosplay and passionate fandoms coming together at FanExpo! Geektropolis tries to keep that feeling all year long, our tag line is "geek on Toronto!" and we look for great local creators and geeky fans to profile and bring the community closer together.

Full quote from Cheryl

Through Facebook messenger, she said:

We love doing Disney Cosplay because it is like a beacon for other people in the fandom to come find us in a sea of other characters. It becomes a great opportunity to meet like minded Disney fans and to possibly escape for the weekend from our "boring human" lives.

We are both creators. We can't seem to go a day without making SOMETHING. Katie is a makeup artist and graphic designer and I'm constantly putting together products for my Etsy shop "LetsMakeSomeMagic". Together we collaborate weekly on our YouTube channel to bring a little magic to everyone's Mondays.

Since starting our channel, our passion for all things Disney has exploded! After our first trip to Walt Disney World together in May 2016, we've been chomping at the bit to go back. Hopefully, if all goes well, there will be more Disney trip vlogs in the near future!

Full quote from YRP

Through email, the Constable said:

Our United superhero program is part of our ongoing efforts to connect with our community and show police in a different light. These characters which were developed by officers with a background in film making appeal to kids and teens alike. They serve as an opportunity for us to start a conversation with youth and connect with them at a non-traditional level.

(This quote I can forward, unlike the others, above.)

Quote source for Blauvelt

I do have audio for part of the seminar that I could email to the general line, but it's not OGG, so it's not going onto Commons. -- Zanimum (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Other notes

• "Trump" moment viewed when passing the booth, I do have a meh quality photo
• Size of the lineups observed

-- Zanimum (talk) 21:23, 3 September 2017 (UTC)

Review of revision 4344307 [Passed]

Revision 4344307 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The reporter notes are thin in places. Aim to overshoot, providing lots more documentation than needed, rather than for bare adequacy. Remember, this isn't about us trusting your honesty (that's an issue with people we don't know), it's about accuracy. How is a reviewer to judge how accurately you've remembered some detail, if they don't know how you went about capturing it for later reportage? Also, the thinner the notes are, the more intellectual labor a reviewer has to put into figuring out which of the things you've said are sufficiently trust-worthy. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4344307 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:19, 6 September 2017 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The reporter notes are thin in places. Aim to overshoot, providing lots more documentation than needed, rather than for bare adequacy. Remember, this isn't about us trusting your honesty (that's an issue with people we don't know), it's about accuracy. How is a reviewer to judge how accurately you've remembered some detail, if they don't know how you went about capturing it for later reportage? Also, the thinner the notes are, the more intellectual labor a reviewer has to put into figuring out which of the things you've said are sufficiently trust-worthy. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.