Puzzlingly, I couldn't find the direct quote at all.
The word "riot" appears to be used by VOA for POV effect.
It seemed important, for neutrality, not to mislead the reader into inferring the Quran burnings were a deliberate insult — we really don't know one way or t'other. The clarifying detail that the burnings took place in a rubbish pit seems to me to stave off such an inference, correctly leaving the reader to wonder about motivation. I decided the addition was within my purview since it was (a) in itself a small detail and (b) indirectly, I believe, a removal of information.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
Puzzlingly, I couldn't find the direct quote at all.
The word "riot" appears to be used by VOA for POV effect.
It seemed important, for neutrality, not to mislead the reader into inferring the Quran burnings were a deliberate insult — we really don't know one way or t'other. The clarifying detail that the burnings took place in a rubbish pit seems to me to stave off such an inference, correctly leaving the reader to wonder about motivation. I decided the addition was within my purview since it was (a) in itself a small detail and (b) indirectly, I believe, a removal of information.
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.
