Talk:UK Prime Minister Theresa May plans to trigger article 50 by end of March next year
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Review of revision 4252265 [Passed][edit]
Revision 4252265 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 4252265 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 23:37, 2 October 2016 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer:
The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
- @Pi zero: Thanks for your constructive criticism as always. There was on malice intended, there was just a little sloppiness, I am
not pro Brexit.completely neutral myself. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Russell's teapot (talk • contribs) 16:53, 3 October 2016- NP. Wikinews does not, in any case, require contributors to be altogether neutral, as that would exclude almost every intelligent person on the planet (along with, of course, plenty of not-so-intelligent ones); not practical for an open wiki. We try to make our means of neutrality something that can be achieved by contributors despite their own biases, and ask that when someone truly can't be neutral (or truly can't appear neutral) they recuse themselves. (Brian McNeil didn't feel he could write about the Scottish independence referendum, for example.) --Pi zero (talk) 17:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
{{editprotected}}[edit]
{{editprotected}} CAT:Economy and business —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Lbertolotti (talk • contribs)
- Not done, I'm not seeing the connection here. BRS (Talk) (Contribs) 14:29, 28 October 2016 (UTC)