Talk:UK denies pressuring Scotland into Lockerbie release
Add topicNotes
[edit]I have to walk away from this in its current state. Feel free to work on it. It could take more than a day for me to fully develop this on my own. Cheers and happy editing. --SVTCobra 02:13, 27 August 2009 (UTC)
- Again, I am forced by time constraints to leave this in development. However, the story seems to have more legs than I initially thought. I have added more sources, so there is lots to work from if anyone should feel inclined to work on this. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:00, 28 August 2009 (UTC)
- I realize the sources are growing exponentially. I am still not done and they are there for further development by me or anyone else who comes along to work on this. They will be trimmed down to only those used before I submit for review. I am also aware that the title is getting out-dated. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
- This story keeps growing and I keep running out of time ... I am swimming upstream ... help would be appreciated, though this story shows no signs of slowing down. --SVTCobra 02:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- OK, I think I have finally caught up with this. There are still a lot of sources, but I did try to trim them down. I know it will take some effort to review, but please know that I appreciate it. Cheers, --SVTCobra 01:56, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
- This story keeps growing and I keep running out of time ... I am swimming upstream ... help would be appreciated, though this story shows no signs of slowing down. --SVTCobra 02:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
- I realize the sources are growing exponentially. I am still not done and they are there for further development by me or anyone else who comes along to work on this. They will be trimmed down to only those used before I submit for review. I am also aware that the title is getting out-dated. Cheers, --SVTCobra 02:11, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Review of revision 870124 [Passed]
[edit]
Revision 870124 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: tl;dr. Sheesh, you write alot. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 870124 of this article has been reviewed by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 01:59, 2 September 2009 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: tl;dr. Sheesh, you write alot. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
transfer denied.
[edit]The article makes no mention of the fact that the Prisoner transfer agreement was rejected. It should also mention that Mr Megrahi was the only Libyan prisoner in Scottish jails, which makes "The fight to get the [prisoner transfer] agreement lasted a long time and was very political, but I want to make clear that we didn't mention Mr Megrahi" a pretty hilarious statement!