Talk:US Supreme Court allows 'light' cigarettes lawsuits

I CREATED this landmark breaking news article, which I just saw and am DEVELOPING. This had opened the NOAH floodgates to civil cases against cigarette companies. Please help me in publishing this.--Florentino Floro (talk) 07:28, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Review #1

Revision 741527 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Third to last paragraph is too similar from paragraph in WSJ article Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Just that little bit of copyright needs to be changed and we will have a nice solid in-depth article! TUFKAAP (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 741527 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Not ready: Third to last paragraph is too similar from paragraph in WSJ article Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Just that little bit of copyright needs to be changed and we will have a nice solid in-depth article! TUFKAAP (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2008 (UTC) Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

One more thing, "The 5-to-4 judgment will encourage dozens of lawsuits claiming billions of dollars in damages," seems to be a bit POV to me. --TUFKAAP (talk) 15:26, 16 December 2008 (UTC)

Review #2

Revision 741892 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Another fine article! TUFKAAP (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 741892 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 03:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Another fine article! TUFKAAP (talk) 03:22, 17 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.