Talk:US Supreme Court dismisses appeal on Obama's citizenship

This is the first Obama citizenship case which was decided by the US S. Court, making it the most newsworthy, since the others are in the lower courts, and about 2 are still pending. Please help me in the review of this landmark Obama issue. Thanks.--Florentino Floro (talk) 12:55, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

Review

Revision 738482 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Interesting article, I wouldn't call it a landmark Obama issue though. TUFKAAP (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 738482 of this article has been reviewed by TUFKAAP (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Interesting article, I wouldn't call it a landmark Obama issue though. TUFKAAP (talk) 16:57, 9 December 2008 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Omissions in story.

This was posted on Tuesday. The supreme court posted an official docket online on Monday saying the Cort Wrotnowski case was submitted by Justice Scalia to conference for Friday, December 12. Why is this critical information left out? The title should read US Supreme Court dismisses one case, but sends another to conference, on Obama's citizenship.

http://www.supremecourtus.gov/docket/08a469.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.198.244.3 (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

• Both cases were sent for conference, but the Denofrio case was not granted cert at its conference on Dec. 5th. The second case wont go before conference until this Friday, Dec. 12th. 208.15.90.2 21:06, 9 December 2008 (UTC)

I edited this article to include the update:The Washington Times

Since, it is just 2 hours that we have a reliable source aside from the 2 S.C. Docket html, I decided to add this:

• In "Philip J. Berg v. Barack Obama, et al.", the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit's Justice Souter denied the injunction on December 9.
• In the new case of "Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State," Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg denied Wrotnowski's injunction application, which was thereafter refiled and assigned to Justice Antonin Scalia. The case was distributed for Conference of December 12. The Washington Times reported that Wrotnowski, a prodigious author and a health-food store owner in Greenwich, Conn. raised the issue of "whether the British citizenship of Mr. Obama's father makes the president-elect ineligible to assume the office."

As of December 9, we have no sources on whether Berg's application had been considered by the US S. Court.

• Tom Ramstack. "Justices to mull Obama citizenship again" — The Washington Times (DC), December 10, 2008
• Stephanie Salter. "Endless line of lawsuits challenges Obama’s natural born-ness" — The Tribune-Star, December 9, 2008
• "Cort Wrotnowski v. Susan Bysiewicz, Connecticut Secretary of State (No. 08A469)" — www.supremecourtus.gov/docket, December 9, 2008
• "Philip J. Berg v. Barack Obama, et al. (No. 08-570)" — supremecourtus.gov/docket, December 9, 2008--Florentino Floro (talk) 08:49, 10 December 2008 (UTC)