Talk:US unemployment rate falls in January

Comment

This article doesn't tell the whole story. The rate, as measured, may have dropped, but it is largely due to how the number is calculated. The economy actually lost jobs during the period. "It's a series of conflicting data. ... The positive take is basically it wasn't a total disaster, but the flip side of it is you're not seeing a recovery," said Doug Roberts,

• http://www.reuters.com/article/usDollarRpt/idUSN0515137320100205
• http://finance.yahoo.com/news/Drop-in-jobless-rate-points-apf-315660824.html?x=0

I'd like to see a more complete story before reviewing. --SVTCobra 03:18, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

I completely agree and would have urged you to add the information yourself, but this is the writing contest. :p Calebrw (talk) 03:59, 6 February 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 952621 [Passed]

Revision 952621 of this article has been reviewed by The New Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Interesting read. --Mikemoral♪♫ 04:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 952621 of this article has been reviewed by The New Mikemoral (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 04:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Interesting read. --Mikemoral♪♫ 04:04, 6 February 2010 (UTC) The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.