Talk:Water main bursts in west Edinburgh; traffic, utilities disrupted
OR[edit]
Will go try get picks in about an hour... --Brian McNeil / talk 11:58, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Images and on-the-spot update filed via scoop. --Brian McNeil / talk 13:24, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
- Verified and added to the article. About to move to review. DENDODGE 13:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
Review of revision 1237447 [Passed][edit]
 |
Revision 1237447 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good OR and pics. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Revision 1237447 of this article has been reviewed by Fetchcomms (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 16:59, 28 May 2011 (UTC).
Comments by reviewer: Good OR and pics. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer. |
Alarmist, inaccurate, poorly researched[edit]
This is the first version of this article that was submitted for review.
I live in Edinburgh, this happened - literally - four bus stops along the road from me. What was originally submitted for review is, in my opinion, utterly unacceptable. A city with near half a million inhabitants was not evacuated; nor was a 30 square mile area flooded by a burst metre-or-so diameter pipe.
Such overstatement, hyperbole, and alarmist reporting is not acceptable. That is why I actually went to the scene, took photographs, and spoke to locals. I would hope people will learn from this - you're writing for Wikinews, not the Daily Fail, Sun, or some other gutter rag. --Brian McNeil / talk 12:21, 29 May 2011 (UTC)