Talk:Wikileaks founder Julian Assange granted bail, set free

Review of revision 1146049 [Failed]

Revision 1146049 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Read over and it looks like some of the info was taken out of the previous article on his bail, however you would need to import the sources from that article, because as things stand the second and third paragraph are unverifiable. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Or you could reference the previous story in the text. You could say, As Wikinews previously reported ... Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 1146049 of this article has been reviewed by Bobby122 (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 14:39, 16 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Not ready: Read over and it looks like some of the info was taken out of the previous article on his bail, however you would need to import the sources from that article, because as things stand the second and third paragraph are unverifiable. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: Or you could reference the previous story in the text. You could say, As Wikinews previously reported ... Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

This is why we have the related news section. Importing sources from an article that has already been verified, and published, would null and void the use of related news. If information is already verified in past articles, then unless that information has changed, there is no need to import sources. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 14:45, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Also if information has changed from the related article, it can be reflected in this piece, which it is. DragonFire1024 (Talk to the Dragon) 15:08, 16 December 2010 (UTC)

Review of revision 1146410 [Passed]

Revision 1146410 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1146410 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 18:55, 17 December 2010 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Editprotected request

{{editprotected}}

Please remove the "Science and Technology" category. An IP has noted that the English Wikipedia Science Portal is displaying several non-science items. -- John of Reading (talk) 09:58, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Not done Sorry, inappropriate request. We aren't going to redefine one of our major categories because it isn't what is wanted by a portal on a sister project. --Pi zero (talk) 13:26, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

It's also "Science and Technology", so this category fits nicely into the article. Removing it would be detrimental. — μ 13:41, 17 January 2011 (UTC)