Talk:Wikinews Shorts: August 15, 2016

Review of revision 4241002 [Not ready]

Revision 4241002 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Honestly, I feel this is below minimal length. Although I see we do have a page that suggests it's marginally possible to have a shorts article with only two items (I'm pretty sure in recent years we've asked for at least three), it really doesn't feel right to have a shorts article with only two items where the total amount of text is also less than would be considered minimal for a single stand-along article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4241002 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 21:42, 14 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Style: Not ready: See below. Comments by reviewer: Honestly, I feel this is below minimal length. Although I see we do have a page that suggests it's marginally possible to have a shorts article with only two items (I'm pretty sure in recent years we've asked for at least three), it really doesn't feel right to have a shorts article with only two items where the total amount of text is also less than would be considered minimal for a single stand-along article. Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4241109 [Passed]

Revision 4241109 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Shorts aren't a very good fit for the modern review scheme; the ratio of review labor per sentence of news text is quite high. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4241109 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:51, 15 August 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Shorts aren't a very good fit for the modern review scheme; the ratio of review labor per sentence of news text is quite high. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.