Talk:Wikinews Shorts: February 19, 2012

Review of revision 1409434 [Passed]

Revision 1409434 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Though it appears rare to publish a shorts article with fewer than three shorts, under these unusual circumstances (three submitted, a substantial review delay causing disqualification of one of the three, and that combination of circumstances being unusual) I'm allowing it. Sic: part of the justification for the exception is that it's exceptional; if it started happening a lot, likely it ought to be less tolerated. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1409434 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:17, 19 February 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: Though it appears rare to publish a shorts article with fewer than three shorts, under these unusual circumstances (three submitted, a substantial review delay causing disqualification of one of the three, and that combination of circumstances being unusual) I'm allowing it. Sic: part of the justification for the exception is that it's exceptional; if it started happening a lot, likely it ought to be less tolerated. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.