Talk:Wikinews interviews Americans Elect presidential candidate Mike Ballantine

My submission here is a bit delayed (been real busy), nonetheless.......this gentleman's PR officer contacted the "general" box at Wikinewsie and nobody responded, so I did...........long story short, I sent these questions to him on January 31st:

"I've spent some time reading about you on your site at www.mikeballantine2012.org. Are you currently running as an independent or are you seeking a party's formal nomination?

Do I understand that you do not currently reside in the U.S.?

Where did you grow up?

Are you married? Do you have children?

Tell us about your education/academic background?

Have any U.S. political leaders formally endorsed you for President?

What are your thoughts about the economy in the U.S. today?

What are your thoughts about America's military....present and future?

Regarding your personal/political ideology, who has influenced you most?

Are there any regional or state-based organizations who've endorsed you or are supporting you?

If elected, what would your first 100 days in office look like?"

............and Mr. Ballantine responded on 2/7/2012(yeah, I know.....I'm a little late here). Bddpaux (talk) 01:45, 5 March 2012 (UTC)

Responses

"Hi Paul,

Thank you for the inquiry and I would be delighted to respond to your questions.

1. Independent or party affiliation: Our campaign was initiated to compete at Americans Elect. Whereas, I am a member of the Green Party and have registered as a Green Party candidate, our emphasis rests with Americans Elect (AE). The requirement for AE candidates is that the winner presents a bi-partisan team to overcome the normal party restrictions. If we tried to run a campaign that was both a Green Party campaign and an AE campaign, then both groups would feel cheated. Once we are successful, we will approach the Green Party at the convention and try to come to an agreement about moving forward but it is not a key issue at this time.

2. In 2011, I lived in Hanoi, Vietnam. Now I am living in Texas for the duration of the campaign.

3. I grew-up in Pennsylvania and graduated from Milton Hershey School for disadvantaged children.

4. I am divorced with 5 children spread across the world. My children, like me, have a global view of life.

5. I earned my Bachelor's in Jewish Studies and Economics. Shortly after that, I enrolled in a Business Diploma program where I learned accounting and finance. Currently, I am enrolled in a Master's program to earn my degree in Education specializing in teaching English as a second language (TESOL) and curriculum development.

6. I don't have any endorsements and don't expect any before the primaries take place. As a nontraditional candidate, people like me represent a threat to the entrenched interests.

7. The US economy has become markedly stratified between the well-educated/wealthy and the working class. Whereas, things are pretty good for a small minority, they continue to deteriorate for everybody else. Right now, we are in the eye of the storm and one can expect things to turn decidedly worse in the spring once the Eurozone moves back into the red and China begins to falter. Until the Federal Reserve takes appropriate action to stop housing prices from falling, America will remain mired in its economic malaise.

8. Even at the reduced figure of $660 billion, America still spends a ridiculous amount on defense to confront imaginary enemies. Certainly, there are groups that oppose America and would like to see us falter but one does not fight bearded guys on horseback with super carriers. Our military is designed to fight or confront other large militaries that no longer exist. America needs to rethink its military posture to reflect the its true requirements over the next decade and stop fighting the wars of the 19th century. To do this, we will need to end over overseas projections and work through regional blocs by providing them with logistical support instead of always resorting to muscle flexing.

9. I have always admired Teddy Roosevelt for his willingness to go against the political animals of the day and wage a campaign to do the right thing. Certainly, he was not perfect but he stood up for the people and took on the corporations. As a child, like many of my friends, I admired JFK for his ideas and the notion that devotion to public service was the responsibility of every citizen. I have never forgotten his mantra and that is one reason why I am running for President today.

10. There are no organizations that are endorsing me. Once we show grassroots support, I will be asking the PERI Institute to evaluate our economic plan and endorse it. Our plan has a lot of similarities to their plan to create jobs. I will also approach leading economists who have written extensively about what needs to be done despite being ignored by Republicans and Democrats.

11. I suspect my first 100 days would be tumultuous. An independent has not won in 100 years, so I imagine Congress will be flummoxed by the prospect of working outside their comfort zone. We plan on presenting a three-in-one package because all three are essential to success. First, our 20 million job creation plan, our single-payer health plan, and our debt restructuring plan. Until Congress takes action in all three areas, America will continue to move sideways or decline overall. With a mandate, we believe we will have some success with Congress but we are prepared to resort to the bully pulpit to promote this legislation.

One final note: Since the inception of our campaign, AE has modified the rules. Our campaign has moved beyond just offering myself as a Presidential candidate. We have a co-Presidency proposal combining the experience of Jon Huntsman as a running mate. Our campaign believes that we cannot simply offer an individual with ideas but that we need to offer a package defining how we will govern the nation. The President is not Superman and I do not pretend to be the most knowledgeable person for the job. You can find our new campaign website at: www.mikeandjon2012.com

Thank you for your time and consideration.

Best regards,

Michael"

..........so now, I have to pretty it up in the article.

Image

Here is an image of Ballantine that can be used in the article: File:Michael D. Ballantine.jpg

--William S. Saturn (talk) 23:17, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Question for interviewer

Did you accidentally omit the question about the military? (If it was intentional, I guess the necessary followup question would be why.) --Pi zero (talk) 23:43, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Oops! ......fixing! Bddpaux (talk) 02:11, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Ok.....I think it's ready. Bddpaux (talk) 02:15, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1428729 [Passed]

Revision 1428729 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I pondered on "we will need to end over overseas projections", keeping in mind this from style guide: When editing spoken quotes, or informal texts and transcripts intended for exclusive interviews (emails and text chat logs), it is permissible to correct typos and errors in punctuation introduced in the transcription process as long as the edit still expresses the meaning exactly the way the source intended. But the problem is that I'm not entirely sure what the interviewee intended here. There's more than one "correct" text that could plausibly, through a simple error, result in the current text. So rather than guess, I'm leaving it be. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1428729 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 02:31, 8 March 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: I pondered on "we will need to end over overseas projections", keeping in mind this from style guide: When editing spoken quotes, or informal texts and transcripts intended for exclusive interviews (emails and text chat logs), it is permissible to correct typos and errors in punctuation introduced in the transcription process as long as the edit still expresses the meaning exactly the way the source intended. But the problem is that I'm not entirely sure what the interviewee intended here. There's more than one "correct" text that could plausibly, through a simple error, result in the current text. So rather than guess, I'm leaving it be. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.