Talk:Wikinews interviews meteorological experts on Cyclone Phalin

Reporter Notes

Scripts to be forwarded. --Computron (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
If someone may be able to improve the lede that would be greatly appreciated. --Computron (talk) 10:15, 13 October 2013 (UTC)
Richman - sent
Snow - sent
Saravanan - sent
Zhang - sent
Titley - sent
Knight - sent
Morrissey - sent

Pre-review

Hi there,

Can't comment on content (since I can't remember my wikinewsie.org password, and so, I can't check it). However, it does seem reliable. Re. style: I made some minor changes; Maybe you could expand the lede by explaining more about consequences of the cyclone (for readers with no knowledge of the topic). Also, I recall there is an 'inline' OR template for the sources section, so that the blank portion of it does not seem empty anymore. It's newsworthiness is unquestionable, as the cyclone (acc. to WP) is still active. If I were still a reviewer, I'd give this a yes. D. Grez 21:31, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Review of revision 2057031 [Passed]

Revision 2057031 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: If you want to add in that graph, there's a parenthetical passage or two from that interviewee that may want adding back in. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2057031 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:04, 14 October 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: If you want to add in that graph, there's a parenthetical passage or two from that interviewee that may want adding back in. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Review of revision 2057052 [Passed]

Revision 2057052 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 2057052 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 19:05, 14 October 2013 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.