Template:Pre-review

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search


[edit] Template documentation

This talk-page template can be used by anyone to communicate an evaluation of an article before it is reviewed. Pre-reviewed articles can help both authors and reviewers successfully publish articles.

Usage

[edit]

Perform any desired edits to the article to help improve it, as the first part of your pre-review. Explain all edits in the edit summary and link to existing policy when appropriate (local links work in edit summaries).

Place this template in a new section titled "Pre-review" on the talk page of the article you have pre-reviewed. Provide values for each parameter (see template data below).

The template will format the findings of the pre-review in a consistent format that is similar to a formal review.

{{Pre-review
|evaluated-url=
|status=
|updated=
|copyright=
|earwig-permalink=
|newsworthy=
|verifiable=
|npov=
|style=
|author-notes=
|reviewer-notes=
|updated-notes=
}}

Example

[edit]
{{Pre-review
|evaluated-url=https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=British_Prime_Minister_Rishi_Sunak_calls_for_general_election_in_UK&oldid=4781850
|status=flag
|updated=~~~~~
|copyright=The third sentence of the second paragraph contains the following phrase "this is some serious testimony." XYZnews has the exact same phrase.
|earwig-permalink=https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikinews&oldid=4783659&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1
|newsworthy=pass
|verifiable=pass
|npov=pass
|style=pass
|author-notes=Ensure distance from sources. Remember date formats per [[Wikinews:Style_guide#Dates]]. 
|reviewer-notes=Not recommended due to scuffing.
|updated-notes=The latest changes unfortunately did not fully correct the issue. 
}}

Renders the following:


Status:    Not ready; Updated 16:12, 27 June 2024 (UTC)

Version evaluated: 4781850

Notes for author(s):

Ensure distance from sources. Remember date formats per Wikinews:Style_guide#Dates.

Notes for reviewer:

Not recommended due to scuffing.

Updated notes:

The latest changes unfortunately did not fully correct the issue.


This is a pre-review only and is not part of the official review process. A pre-review is meant to help the article author or authors improve the article and increase the likelihood of getting published. This pre-review was not done by a reviewer and represents a recommendation that can be heeded or ignored.



Parameters

[edit]
  • status: The overall recommendation to
    • pass (recommend publish)
    • unsure If used, be sure to explain why in reviewer-notes.
    • flag (not ready)
    • leave blank (no recommendation).
  • updated: Use this if you need to change the status of a previous pre-review. Use five tildes ~~~~~ for current date and time.
  • evaluated-url: The URL that points directly to the version of the article evaluated. If changes are made after the pre-review, this link informs the reviewer which version was evaluated. To obtain the URL, view the article history and right-click on the time/date stamp of the latest version reviewed. Select 'copy link.' Then paste that link as the evaluated-url.
  • copyright: Use pass to indicate compliance with WN:COPYRIGHT. Leave blank to indicate it was not evaluated. Use freeform notes to explain how it's not ready.
  • earwig-permalink: The URL or permalink that points to Earwig's Copyvio Detector evaluation of the article. To obtain the URL, locate the permalink, which appears under the "submit" button on Earwig's after the web page has displayed the results. Right-click the permalink and select "copy link" and paste the URL as the value for earwig-permalink.
  • newsworthy: Use pass to indicate compliance with WN:NEWSWORTHY. Leave blank to indicate it was not evaluated. Use freeform notes to explain how it's not ready.
  • verifiable: Use pass to indicate compliance with WN:Cite_sources. Leave blank to indicate it was not evaluated. Use freeform notes to explain how it's not ready.
  • npov: Use pass to indicate compliance with WN:NPOV. Leave blank to indicate it was not evaluated. Use freeform notes to explain how it's not ready.
  • style: Use pass to indicate compliance with WN:STYLE. Leave blank to indicate it was not evaluated. Use freeform notes to explain how it's not ready.
  • author-notes: Freeform notes to provide to the author(s).
  • reviewer-notes: Freeform notes to provide to the reviewer.
  • updated-notes: Freeform notes to explain the updated status. If you use updated, you must include updated-notes to explain the change.

Template parameters[Edit template data]

ParameterDescriptionTypeStatus
evaluated-urlevaluated-url

The raw URL obtained from the article's version history (right-click the date and select 'copy link')

Example
https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=British_Prime_Minister_Rishi_Sunak_calls_for_general_election_in_UK&oldid=4781850
Stringsuggested
statusstatus

Conveys overall recommendation of the pre-reviewer as 'recommend publish,' 'not ready,' 'unsure,' or 'no recommendation.'

Suggested values
pass flag Unsure
Default
No recommendation provided
Stringoptional
updatedupdated

Indicates the date and time the status was updated

Suggested values
~~~~~
Example
updated=~~~~~
Stringoptional
copyrightcopyright

Indicates evaluation of copyright infringement

Suggested values
pass Freeform note
Default
Not evaluated
Example
copyright=pass
Stringoptional
earwig-permalinkearwig-permalink

URL permalink to earwig's copyvio test

Default
blank (provides no link)
Example
earwig-permalink=https://copyvios.toolforge.org/?lang=en&project=wikinews&oldid=4783659&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1
Stringoptional
newsworthynewsworthy

Indicates evaluation of Newsworthiness

Suggested values
pass Freeform note
Default
Not evaluated
Example
newsworthy=pass
Stringoptional
verifiableverifiable

Indicates evaluation of Verifiability

Suggested values
pass Freeform note
Default
Not evaluated
Example
verifiable=The statement "Red cars go faster than blue cars." was not found in any source.
Stringoptional
npovnpov

Indicates evaluation of Neutral Point of View

Suggested values
pass Freeform note
Default
Not evaluated
Stringoptional
stylestyle

Indicates evaluation of Manual of Style

Suggested values
pass Freeform note
Default
Not evaluated
Stringoptional
author-notesauthor-notes

Notes addressed to the author(s)

Suggested values
Freeform note
Example
author-notes=The article passes the minimum requirements but could be expanded with additional background information.
Stringsuggested
reviewer-notesreviewer-notes

Notes addressed to the reviewer

Suggested values
Freeform note
Example
reviewer-notes=This article follows-up on a previous article. Having both published would be beneficial.
Stringoptional
updated-notesupdated-notes

Long-form notes regarding the update in status.

Example
updated-notes=The latest changes unfortunately did not fully correct the issue.
Stringoptional