User:Michael.C.Wright/sandbox
Working pages
[edit]- Michael.C.Wright/TranslationAnalysis
- Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/timeline
- Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/pre-review
- Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/quotation
- Module:CheckCategory (broken)
- Module:PreReviewStatus (broken)
- User:Michael.C.Wright/review-checklist
- User:Michael.C.Wright/sandbox/The problem
Maintenance tasks
[edit]Logical flow of templates:
{{delete}}* ← {{abandoned}} ← {{stale}} ← {{develop}} → {{review}} → {{publish}} → {{archive}}
*Note: {{delete}} is not part of proposed deletion. It is a separate process. Unfortunately, I believe they are found differently from articles marked for speedy deletion.
Check for abandonment
[edit]WN:PROD: {{subst:aband}} if not edited in four days
Disputed articles not Abandoned, OR, or Copyvio
[edit]- 12 November 2024: Concerns about BioRender copyright licensing spurs interest in beta release of NIH's BioArt public domain repository
- 6 November 2024: Two Days to the Election: an Update
Disputed articles not marked as developing, abandoned, OR, or Copyvio
[edit]- 12 November 2024: Concerns about BioRender copyright licensing spurs interest in beta release of NIH's BioArt public domain repository
- 6 November 2024: Two Days to the Election: an Update
Copyright violations not marked for deletion (mark for deletion after 24 hours)
[edit]There are no articles for this topic.
Not in typical queues, not disputed, and not OR
[edit]
Test review queue sorting based on template:pre-review status
[edit]Articles in Review
[edit]Module:PreReviewStatus (currently borked)
{{#invoke:PreReviewStatus|listArticles|100}}
Test pre-review
[edit]Status: No recommendation; Updated 15:19, 22 June 2024 (UTC)
Version evaluated: URL not provided
- Copyright:
Not evaluated - Newsworthiness: Not evaluated
- Verifiability: Not evaluated
- NPOV: Not evaluated
- Style: Not evaluated
Notes for author(s):
test
Notes for reviewer:
No notes provided for reviewer
Updated notes:
test updated notes
This is a pre-review only and is not part of the official review process. A pre-review is meant to help the author or authors improve the article and increase the likelihood of it passing a formal review. This pre-review was not done by a reviewer and represents a recommendation that can be heeded or ignored.
Test tq
[edit]Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua. —Michael.C.Wright (Talk/Published) 14:08, 4 September 2024 (UTC)
Test Verify
[edit]Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.[Source] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.[Unsourced] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.[Source] Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Nulla facilisi. Vestibulum vitae elit non velit accumsan gravida.