User talk:223.237.219.120

From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Wikinews:Three revert rule[edit]

You are in violation of the three revert rule and deserving to be blocked. --SVTCobra 23:20, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

That is for disruptive editing, which by the way, does not apply when the author is trying to excercise right to use their particular choice of English, and when they are not wrong.
223.237.219.120 (talk) 23:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
And that is exactly what you are engaged in. I see you violated it again. --SVTCobra 23:30, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
speak to pizero after they have reviewed the article.
223.237.219.120 (talk) 23:31, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No. There is nothing to talk about. --SVTCobra 23:34, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
actually, there is. @Pi zero:
•–• 23:42, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
No, there really isn't. "Aunty" or "auntie" is informal regardless of what Wiktionary does or doesn't say. It should not be used, just like we don't use "mommy" and "daddy". It is not subject to an "author's choice". --SVTCobra 23:48, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In India, we are taught “aunty” in school. Up to a point that “aunt” seems alien”. If you use Google for searching, go for Google Scholar otherwise all you would find is link to porn sites.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 23:54, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then I suggest you bring it up with the headmaster at your school or perhaps the Education Minister. File:Aunty screenshot.png --SVTCobra 00:08, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Okay then; tell every user on-wiki to strictly abide by English (UK).
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:11, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

If you looked, there was also US English. --SVTCobra 00:13, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
That isn’t the real English. That isn’t the version used in all the US states to begin with. If English (IN) is not allowed, why should one allow English (US)?
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:17, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
We only have your word for it being proper English (IN). No disrespect, but you are not a credible source. --SVTCobra 00:21, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
should have pointed before voting for my accreditation request.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:23, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
though a blog, but the numbers confirm I am not wrong. link.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It also clearly shows it as being informal. If someone was changing "aunty" to "auntie", I'd agree with your choice of spelling, however, as it is informal, that discussion is moot. --SVTCobra 00:33, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cop is informal, too. Nobody acts crazy that time.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:36, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have no idea what you are talking about, but I wouldn't allow that either. --SVTCobra 00:40, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Then fix all those articles mentioning “cops”.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 00:43, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A quick gander, just to humor you. Seems that most if not all are either in quotes or in source titles. --SVTCobra 00:50, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, most != all.
103.254.128.130 (talk) 01:02, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment
This is the contributions page for an anonymous user who has not created an account yet or who does not use it. We therefore have to use the numerical IP address to identify them. Such an IP address can be shared by several users. If you are an anonymous user and feel that irrelevant comments have been directed at you, please create an account and/or log in to avoid future confusion with other anonymous users.
[WHOIS • RDNS • RBLs • Traceroute• Torstatus • Rangeblock finder • Global Blocks]
[RIRs: America · Europe · Africa · Asia-Pacific · Latin America/Caribbean]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikinews.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:223.237.219.120&oldid=4406551"