Wikinews:Accreditation requests/Pramod.bhardwaj
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Closed as Unsuccessful due to lack of experience on Wikinews. Tyrol5 (talk) 19:55, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Name: Pramod S Bhardwaj
- Location: Chandigarh,India
- Areas of interest: Reporting on Environment, Wildlife, Energy and Agriculture
- Reason: Come out with stuff that is untouched by Media. Wikimedia accreditation will help entry at the specifically restricted sites need to be searched avidly.
- Accomplishments: Conducted research on level pollutants to identify highly and less affected places in state. Another research based story in BBC Wildlife magazine pertaining to dwindling number of blind dolphins in Ganges, Yangzte and Indus rivers.
- Contact information:
- User ID: 283734
- Applied on: 13:44, 19 August 2011 (UTC)
I fixed the location of this page; I directed the user to post here after receiving original submission in OTRS ticket 2011081710009166. Adrignola (talk) 13:48, 19 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose due to lack of published Wikinews articles. --Brian McNeil / talk 05:30, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]- Completely and utterly oppose. User has posted two blatant copyright violations in a row, and obviously has some religious axe to grind; blanked the Howdy off his userpage with zero evidence any of it was read. --Brian McNeil / talk 06:47, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Straight Oppose - severe lack of published work, would prefer to see some published stuff before even considering the user for an AR. BarkingFish (talk) 12:45, 20 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.