Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Thunderhead 3
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
This RfA has ended. I am awaiting administrator / bureaucrat confirmation.
I think it's time for Thunderhead to join the admin team now. To boost everyone's memory: Thunderhead already requested adminship twice (see Wikinews:Administrators/Archive). Since then he has written more stories, such as NYC students attempt to revive stoop culture and Wikinews interviews Florence Devouard, chair of the Wikimedia Foundation, but he also does gnome edits. He has experience on Wikia and a game wiki as an admin. Thunderhead definitely has humor, I can't remember him being negative anywhere.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 14:29, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Do you accept? Sure! --Thunderhead - (talk) 23:04, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Questions
- What is the meaning of life?
- The meaning of life? 42. --Thunderhead - (talk) 03:21, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Wrong! Clearly that is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything is 42 (google calculator never lies), However just life in itself is a much different thing. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- I always thought that was funny how Google did that. Just life in itself, eh?
To serve Jimbo Wales, master of the Cabal...
- I always thought that was funny how Google did that. Just life in itself, eh?
- Wrong! Clearly that is the meaning of life, the universe, and everything is 42 (google calculator never lies), However just life in itself is a much different thing. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:09, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--Thunderhead - (talk) 05:12, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The second commandment - "Thou shalt have no other benevolent dictators before me. Thou shalt not make unto thee a graven image of sysops." — meta:Ten Commandments. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:18, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Votes:
- Comment please accept, I think you've done enough now to earn the community's trust whereas before you may not have. --Brian McNeil / talk 16:50, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support --Brian McNeil / talk 08:46, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Thunderhead would make a great admin! After all, this is his third nom. —FellowWikiNews (W) (sign here!) 20:45, 26 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. Fully engaged with community goings-on. -Edbrown05 09:49, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support as nominator.--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 10:47, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - Dedicated community member. ★MESSEDROCKER★ 11:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - I've only been here a short time but i have noticed your edits - all very good!!--Markie 22:24, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support supported last time, and I still support. Bawolff ☺☻ 23:06, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support last time I didn't support, because I said I would support in February on your test. Well, with only hours remaining, I'm full-filling my promise :P terinjokes | Talk | Come visit the WikiBistro 23:45, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hours remaining? I thought RfA's lasted for seven days? --Thunderhead - (talk) 23:47, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They do :) --Cspurrier 01:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Good, thought I was going senile. --Thunderhead - (talk) 01:45, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Hours remaining in Feburary |||terinjokes | Talk 11:17, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- They do :) --Cspurrier 01:41, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support I had a few doubts before, but I think Thunderhead is now ready to be an admin.--Cspurrier 01:42, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I thought only other admins could vote here. At least two voters are not admins (according to the latest list [1]) --SVTCobra 02:06, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Anyone can vote (though technically if you have less the 100 edits or have been registered less then month, your vote does not count for much)--Cspurrier 02:12, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, anyone can vote, except if you're very new, or a sock, or if you're blocked. Bawolff ☺☻ 03:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, OK, well I guess that the 'common people' could vote in someone. It is not like a country club. Which is good. I will still refrain from voting.--SVTCobra 03:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, TINC. Bawolff ☺☻ 04:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- TINC - thats what you think :) Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 18:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless they want you to think, that's what you think! Bawolff ☺☻ 05:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But if they want us to think what they want us to think which is what we are supposed to think, then doesn't that mean there is a cabal? --Thunderhead - (talk) 05:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- sshhh!, you're confusing the cabal's tiny little head. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Although Meta has a confirmation process in which only administrators can vote. --Thunderhead - (talk) 02:50, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- sshhh!, you're confusing the cabal's tiny little head. Bawolff ☺☻ 05:13, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- But if they want us to think what they want us to think which is what we are supposed to think, then doesn't that mean there is a cabal? --Thunderhead - (talk) 05:06, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Unless they want you to think, that's what you think! Bawolff ☺☻ 05:00, 3 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- TINC - thats what you think :) Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 18:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, TINC. Bawolff ☺☻ 04:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, OK, well I guess that the 'common people' could vote in someone. It is not like a country club. Which is good. I will still refrain from voting.--SVTCobra 03:28, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Yep, anyone can vote, except if you're very new, or a sock, or if you're blocked. Bawolff ☺☻ 03:08, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support hell yes Brian | (Talk) | New Zealand Portal 18:53, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support DragonFire1024 18:57, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Jacques Divol 13:42, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.