Wikinews:Requests for permissions/Administrator/Uncle G
From Wikinews, the free news source you can write!
- The following discussion is preserved as an archive of a successful request for adminship. Please do not modify it.
It says above that 'admins should be trusted by the community'. Well, I trust him! Dan100 (Talk) 12:58, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support! Lyellin 13:36, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose. at this time. The technical work was great re; the election. I think its just too soon (less than 2 months here)+ from his user talk page; maybe too opinionated(pushy?) for administrator. I think we need some more really mellow people at this point in time. I would certainly reconsider my vote in a month. Paulrevere2005 19:15, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support; Its been about a month and I now support Uncle G for administrator. Paulrevere2005 12:23, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support --Cspurrier 19:23, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support. → CGorman (Talk) 21:20, 11 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support, under the condition that Uncle G creates a user page (currently User:Uncle G is a red link), even if just a stub; I find it to be a useful trust building measure, and it also makes the access to the talk page more obvious.--Eloquence 03:16, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- I disagree. That is not a stated condition of being made an admin, it's not even important, and as you can see Uncle G has clear consensus to be sysopped. Dan100 (Talk) 07:02, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I agree with Erik (sorry Dan!), it drives me insane seeing the red link every day for Uncle G, even if he had one sentence on his page explaining his interest in wikinews or whatever it would be greatly appreciated. → CGorman (Talk)- Thanks UG, nice tidy userpage. → CGorman (Talk) 11:46, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC) 20:43, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- There used to be another regular user who had a red link for a user page, and i got so annoyed by it one day that i edited the page to be just a single space, just so it would come up as blue on rc. But now, for the life of me, I can't remember who it was... ~The bellman | Smile 10:32, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I disagree. That is not a stated condition of being made an admin, it's not even important, and as you can see Uncle G has clear consensus to be sysopped. Dan100 (Talk) 07:02, 12 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Support - / 21:35, 15 May 2005 (UTC)
- Support. -- Davodd | Talk 08:29, 28 May 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oppose, he has not been around this community for long enough. Andrew pmk 01:30, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support ~The bellman | Smile 10:28, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Support - Wiktionary:Wonderfool Cos he's a sysop on wiktionary innit
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it.. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate talk page. No further edits should be made to this page.