Wikinews talk:Administrators

If you are requesting administrator action, please see Wikinews:Admin action alerts.

• November 2004 -- May 2006
• (no conversation in June 2006 - October 2006)
• August 2006 -- November 2006
• /Archive 1 - (December 2006 - )

Change to admins page

[1] - I disagree with this change to the page. Let's keep it simple, just the regular list of admins, and the inactive. No need for this "highly active" business, then we'd be constantly changing usernames from three different sections. Cirt (talk) 16:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

You're probably right about that. I was just thinking that users who needed admin help might receive quicker answers from users on such a list (since a lot of users on the "active" list aren't very active at all), but then again, that's what WN:AAA is for. Cheers, Tempodivalse [talk] 17:00, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, WN:AAA is better than pinging individual admins anyways. Cirt (talk) 17:02, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Active vs. Inactive

[2] = Good move by ShakataGaNai (talk · contribs), for reasons already made in his edit summary. Cirt (talk) 07:37, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, but now they're no longer in alphabetically order. ;) Calebrw (talk) 19:09, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

What is the purpose of the list?

Do [3] and [4], serve the same purpose without extra maintenance? --InfantGorilla (talk) 20:10, 12 July 2010 (UTC)