Wikinews talk:Briefs/April 28, 2012

Script review comments

The Sandra Fluke item isn't in an acceptable state, tbh. It doesn't explain what the award is, i.e., who gives it; without which, the story can't be understood properly. (I also pulled material that isn't part of a summary of our article, nor, that I could find, even contained in any of the Related news articles.)

The other items, I believe are now okay (following some edits during review). --Pi zero (talk) 04:24, 28 April 2012 (UTC)

Review of revision 1483755 [Passed]

Revision 1483755 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 1483755 of this article has been reviewed by DragonFire1024 (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 21:42, 28 April 2012 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: None added. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.