NZ opposition leader admits to fundamentalist contacts
Monday, September 12, 2005
The New Zealand General Election | |||||||||||||||||||
Preliminary Election Results: | |||||||||||||||||||
100 % Counted:5 hrs in to the Count
| |||||||||||||||||||
Other Wikinews election coverage: | |||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||
Background: | |||||||||||||||||||
Wikipedia, Wikinews' sibling project, has in-depth background articles on: | |||||||||||||||||||
Don Brash, leader of the opposition National Party in New Zealand, admitted that he was aware that members of the Exclusive Brethren church were going to release contentious brochures attacking his political rivals. Mr Brash said he had met members of the church a number of times. He has admitted today that he was aware of the group's intention to publish brochures that were critical of the Labour Party and The Greens. A spokesman for the Group admitted to having spent NZ$500,000 on the campaign so far.
The pamphlets were published without the link to the Church being obvious. However, former members of the Church identified the men as belonging to the church which has been described as a sect. The Exclusive Brethren are a closed order. Its members are not allowed to listen to Radio, Television or use computers at all. There are approximately 2000 members in New Zealand and active branches in the US and Australia. They are linked to political support for George Bush and other conservative politicians.
Sources
[edit]- "Brash accused of lies over Brethren pamphlet" — Stuff.co.nz, September 9, 2005
- "Veiled sect hails Bush, Martinez" — sptimes.com, January 18, 2005
The text of this article has been released into the public domain. In the event that this is not legally possible, this article may be used for any purpose, without any condition, unless such conditions are required by law. This applies worldwide. Copyright terms on images, however, may vary, so please check individual image pages prior to duplication. Please note that this only applies to Wikinews content created prior to September 25, 2005. All content created after that date is released under a Creative Commons license which is mentioned at the bottom of each article. This is currently the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 License. |