Talk:Borussia M'Gladbach sacks coach Schubert; appoints Hecking

Review of revision 4272207 [Not ready]

Revision 4272207 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Two-source concern impinges on breadth of perspective in this case; see below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The two-source rule is difficult to place on the list of five review criteria, because under various circumstances it bears on each of the first four (and therefore it might be described as "style", making a clean sweep of the five). In this case, I'm particularly uncomfortable about breadth of perspective. Would an independent source have an entirely different view of this sequence of events? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Revision 4272207 of this article has been reviewed by Pi zero (talk · contribs) and found not ready at 13:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Newsworthiness: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Verifiability: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. NPOV: Not ready: Two-source concern impinges on breadth of perspective in this case; see below. Style: Not reviewed. Please address other issues. Comments by reviewer: The two-source rule is difficult to place on the list of five review criteria, because under various circumstances it bears on each of the first four (and therefore it might be described as "style", making a clean sweep of the five). In this case, I'm particularly uncomfortable about breadth of perspective. Would an independent source have an entirely different view of this sequence of events? Questions about the above? Ask. If possible, please address the above issues then resubmit the article for another review (by replacing {{tasks}} in the article with {{review}}). This talk page will be updated with subsequent reviews.

Review of revision 4272298 [Passed]

Revision 4272298 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The mutually-independent source issue is something of a judgement call. While both original sources were football org press releases, I'm not convinced they don't count as mutually independent. That said, I fully understand why PiZ had other ideas. With it being so borderline I'm happy enough to count the DW source as meeting the criteria. It's unusual in the extreme, but in the circumstances it's a nod from me. As ever, I find myself hoping I've not made any mistakes in verification. Football is something I watch on rare occasions; it's not a subject I know the ins and outs of. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.

Revision 4272298 of this article has been reviewed by Blood Red Sandman (talk · contribs) and has passed its review at 20:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC). Copyright: Passed Newsworthiness: Passed Verifiability: Passed NPOV: Passed Style: Passed Comments by reviewer: The mutually-independent source issue is something of a judgement call. While both original sources were football org press releases, I'm not convinced they don't count as mutually independent. That said, I fully understand why PiZ had other ideas. With it being so borderline I'm happy enough to count the DW source as meeting the criteria. It's unusual in the extreme, but in the circumstances it's a nod from me. As ever, I find myself hoping I've not made any mistakes in verification. Football is something I watch on rare occasions; it's not a subject I know the ins and outs of. The reviewed revision should automatically have been edited by removing {{Review}} and adding {{Publish}} at the bottom, and the edit sighted; if this did not happen, it may be done manually by a reviewer.